In our most recent discussion of The Wind that Shakes the Barley, two main questions were asked (or there were two main questions that I remember and wanted to comment on): 1) what causes the change in Damian from healer to murderer? And 2) How do the readings of space play into the spaces of the movie?
In terms of the change from healer to murderer the progression was not an easy one for Damian to make, but in the fight for civil rights and one’s home violence is inevitable. Throughout history when we see people being oppressed or torn apart by colonizing monsters, those affected react in violent ways to get their message of disapproval to those in power. When savages like the black & tans are running around terrorizing people and killing them for simply not saying their name in the right language, peaceful protest is most definitely not an option. Also a cause for Damian’s transformation is the national idea, which consumed him and caused him to forget about his long-term plans of doctoral bliss and starting a family of his own. At times like this the short-term is what is (or what seems to be) most important, keeping loved ones safe while voicing opposition to the powers that be - wouldn’t violent behavior sort of be expected? I wonder if Damian’s future plans would even be feasible if he had gotten on that train to London (that’s where he was going right?)? Would something else awful and possibly fatal have happened to Sinead? What would have happened in his town had he gotten on that train?
In terms of spaces, what really stuck out to me was the fact that there really were NO safe spaces. Throughout the movie homes, which are usually safe havens, are invaded, community spaces are invaded, and any other places (train stations, bars, forests…) are ultimately invaded and terrorized on the regular. That’s a bit unsettling, there’s usually always somewhere safe and free of violence, what are people to do when there literally is nowhere? Its like the ultimate psychological slap in the face, much like what happens in horror movies. Another aspect of space is that while we cannot tell exactly what/where Ireland is, the members of Damian and Teddy’s army embody what their Ireland was and are fighting to keep it alive. I believe this idea of keeping the old Ireland alive is also seen in our latest reading on spaces. Casey explores the idea of subjection, which basically says that we are subject to places we have been because they are in us, whether is was a place we didn’t like, a place we enjoyed, or a place we frequented like home, places stay with us(688). I didn’t quite get it when I first read it, but thinking about the movie puts in into perspective.
Jae, what great insights into the film. I love the fact that your brought Casey into the discussion. His article is so apropos the conversations we've been having about the film (and I think the way we'll continue to talk about space and place. You're absolutely right, I think, about no safe spaces in the film. In some ways, Cracking India may parallel this motif. I think where our viewpoints diverge are around Damien's motivations. I remain unconvinced that he his driven by nationalistic passions as is Teddy and the other men. The film leaves that ambiguous, and, if that is the case, then worth thinking about. I guess I never see Damien spouting nationalistic rhetoric (not necessarily the marker of nationalism). What if he's driven by his love for Sinead? Just a thought...
ReplyDeleteYes! I really think that Damien's decisions throughout the movie are driven by a love for his family and community (exemplified primarily by Teddy and Sinead) and a desire to keep them together (and not by the same nationalistic pride that drove Teddy). For Damien, space and home was created by his loved ones. In other words, family, for Damien, is a huge part of his being and his 'dwelling' (as defined by Relph and explained in the Smythe essay). This dwelling is represented visually/spacially by the house in the film (Lauren mentioned several important house scenes in her post). I'm going to write more about this in my post!
ReplyDeletefirst of all, the tone of this blog is awesome. the comparison to horror films is interesting, and i definitely agree with Damien and the IRA having no option for peaceful protest...what else are they going to do? I wrote a paper once on that topic. If governments deny that policy is an instrument of violence, oppressed communities will have no other way to react than violence. The notion of policy as violence may be an interesting way to read Cracking India.
ReplyDelete